MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082692556 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2015.2417868

Generating Chirped Microwave Pulses Using an Integrated Distributed Fabry–Pérot Cavity in Silicon-on-Insulator

2015· article· en· W2082692556 on OpenAlexafffund
Ming Ma, Martin Rochette, Lawrence R. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC MicrosystemsUniversity of WashingtonNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceFabry–Pérot interferometerFree spectral rangeOptoelectronicsOpticsBroadbandSilicon on insulatorChirpFiber Bragg gratingMicrowaveOptical filterPhotodetectorPhotonicsSiliconLaserWavelengthPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate photonic generation of chirped microwave pulses (CMPs) using an integrated distributed Fabry-Pérot cavity (DFPC) in silicon-on-insulator as a spectral shaper. The DPFC is based on a pair of spatially offset chirped Bragg gratings and has a response with varying free spectral range. The spectral shaper is used to filter broadband pulses from a mode-locked fiber laser, and CMPs are obtained at the output of a photodetector following a wavelength-to-time mapping process in a dispersive medium. We generate CMPs with a central frequency of up to 20 GHz, a radio-frequency (RF) chirp of 0.012 GHz/ps, and a time-bandwidth product of 14.5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207