MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082718269 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0114

Going Out of Their Way: Tourism, Authenticity, and Resistance in Contemporary Atlantic-Canadian Literature

2008· article· en· W2082718269 on OpenAlex
Herb Wyile

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismCommodificationHospitalityPoliticsResistance (ecology)Tourism geographySociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceEconomyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Going Out of Their Way: Tourism, Authenticity, and Resistance in Contemporary Atlantic-Canadian Literature Herb Wyile (bio) Tourism, observes Newfoundland writer Edward Riche in a recent interview, “is a kind of pollution” “[A]s something that one has to rely upon for economic survival” he adds, “it is the last act of desperation” (“Equal-Opportunity” 212). Riche’s critical view of tourism is widely echoed in contemporary writing in Atlantic Canada, reflecting the importance of tourism to the economic and cultural life of the region but also reflecting an increasingly sophisticated theoretical appreciation of the dynamics of tourism as a global phenomenon. As Riche’s comment suggests, there is a significant structural relationship between tourism and economic under-development, a relationship which has been a central theme in the growing body of commentary on the cultural, political, social, and economic consequences of tourism. Tourist destinations are more likely to develop not out of an ingrained sense of hospitality and an instinctive inclination of host societies to share the bounty of their locale with others but out of economic necessity. Tourism, as Kevin Meethan argues, reconfigures “the boundaries between hospitality as a form of social obligation ... and hospitality as a commodified form” (149). Consequently, tourism is commonly characterized by a fundamental tension: that it requires a staged hospitality, an openness to visitors that, while potentially genuine, is also to [End Page 159] some degree compelled. That is, tourist destinations—particularly ostensibly “exotic” locales—tend to be framed within an economic and political asymmetry between hosts and visitors and, indeed, are often characterized by conditions of economic exploitation and coercion. In short, rather than an innocent, free flow of people from one area to another, tourism involves a kind of coerced hospitality, with host societies compelled to go out of their way to cater to tourists’ expectations and needs. Unsurprisingly, one result of such asymmetrical power relations is a resentment of and resistance to the material and symbolic imposition that tourism typically represents. Such a reaction is increasingly visible in the literature of Atlantic Canada, an economically underdeveloped and vulnerable region particularly reliant on tourism. Much contemporary Atlantic Canadian writing—the fiction of Riche, Alistair MacLeod, and Lynn Coady,1 for instance, and Frank Barry’s trenchant play Wreckhouse—highlights the ways in which tourism in the region amounts to commodifying underdevelopment and affords valuable lessons about the economic, political, and cultural tensions and conflicts elided by the buoyant hyperbole of tourist promotion. As Graham Huggan argues in The Postcolonial Exotic, the construction of the global margins as culturally exotic leisure spaces amounts to an extension of colonial relations. One of the more positive valences of postcolonial discourse, he contends, is its resistance to exoticism as a profoundly subordinating paradigm that “must be confronted, incorporated into works that challenge—often looking to subvert—metropolitan mainstream cultural codes” (27). Given that Atlantic Canada’s position within Canada has been described by numerous scholars as being characterized by a kind of internal colonization,2 such a description (in appropriately modified form) seems apt for describing the tenor of much contemporary writing in the region. Tourism increasingly seems to be a preoccupation of writers in Atlantic Canada, and there is a profound dissonance between the testy attitude of writers such as Riche and Barry toward tourism and the cheery boosterism of the tourism industry itself. This attitude is nicely captured in one of MacLeod’s [End Page 160] most powerful stories, “Clearances,” set in a Cape Breton increasingly being transformed by the forces of a leisure economy. Bristling at tourists’ objections to his cutting down trees to make a living, a young man bitterly complains, “This isn’t my recreational area. This is my home” (426). As Meethan observes, the “development of tourist space means change at the level of lived experience for those whose space of home, or of work, is the space of leisure for others” (37), and this conflict is registered in a number of ways in contemporary writing in Atlantic Canada. The preoccupation with tourism in Atlantic-Canadian literature tells us much about current economic, political, social, and cultural conditions in the region but also tells us much about tourism as...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it