MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082758143 · doi:10.5555/2602339.2602384

Poster abstract: precision improvement of aircrafts attitude estimation through gyro sensors data fusion in a redundant inertial measurement unit

2014· article· en· W2082758143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Processing in Sensor Networks · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitSensor fusionComputer scienceGyroscopeInertial frame of referenceVariance (accounting)Inertial navigation systemUnits of measurementAngular velocityReal-time computingComputer visionEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a redundant strap-down attitude system which uses three miniaturized gyro sensors linear clusters in the inertial detection unit. The data from the sensors in each of the three clusters are fused by using a statistical method based on the minimum variance method, in order to improve the useful angular speed signal measured by the detection unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it