MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082776760 · doi:10.5380/rv.v1i14/15/16.17440

Orientação Profissional sobre a Ótica do Tempo

2005· article· pt· W2082776760 on OpenAlexaff
Eliane Filgueiras

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Vernáculo · 2005
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill-Queen's University Press
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A relação da humanidade com o tempo reflete uma constante necessidade desta de situar-se a partir da linearidade temporal. É a partir desta linearidade que o sujeito internaliza e concebe o conceito de tempo e sente que existe lógica naquilo que conhece enquanto passado, presente e futuro. O processo de Orientação Profissional demonstra quais as diferentes repercussões da relação que o sujeito estabelece com o seu tempo lógico no movimento de escolha profissional. O presente artigo pretende apontar algumas implicações desta inter relação entre tempo e escolha.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista VernáculoSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207