Iodine-129 constraints on residence times of deep marine brines in the Canadian Shield: Comment and Reply
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| January 01, 2003 Iodine-129 constraints on residence times of deep marine brines in the Canadian Shield: Comment and Reply: COMMENT Amitai Katz; Amitai Katz 1Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Abraham Starinsky Abraham Starinsky 1Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Amitai Katz 1Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Abraham Starinsky 1Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Publisher: Geological Society of America First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2003) 31 (1): 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0093:ICORTO>2.0.CO;2 Article history First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Amitai Katz, Abraham Starinsky; Iodine-129 constraints on residence times of deep marine brines in the Canadian Shield: Comment and Reply: COMMENT. Geology 2003;; 31 (1): 93–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0093:ICORTO>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Bottomley et al. (2002) present 129I analyses of hypersaline brines from the Con gold mine in Yellowknife (Northwest Territories). The authors assume that the 129I formed by 238U fission within the metabasalt host rocks and diffused from the rock matrix into the fracture fluid, explaining its present concentration therein. Knowing the U concentration in the metabasalt, the authors apply the in situ 129I production and migration model developed for the Stripa granite by Fabryka-Martin et al. (1989) and argue that the 238U-129I system in the Precambrian shield achieved secular equilibrium, indicating a residence... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".