Hemodynamic and histomorphometric characteristics of heart failure induced by aortic stenosis in the guinea pig: comparison of two constriction sizes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heart failure induced by aortic stenosis in young guinea pigs could constitute an interesting model for pharmacology, but its natural history needs to be characterized. One hundred five guinea pigs (3-4 weeks old) underwent thoracic aortic banding with 12- (B12G) or 14-gauge (B14G) needles or similar sham operations (S12G, S14G). Animals alive at 7 d (S12G, n = 16; B12G, n = 28; S14G, n = 19; B14G, n = 27) were assessed at 60 or 120 d. At 60 d, compared with sham groups, left ventricular (LV) mass and wall thickness increased in operated groups, but LV systolic pressure and right ventricular (RV) wall thickness only increased in the B14G group. At 120 d, B12G animals still showed signs of compensated hypertrophy with LV and RV wall thickening (+8%, +21%) and LV dilation (+20%), whereas B14G animals showed signs of decompensation with LV end-diastolic pressure increase (+167%) and mean arterial pressure decrease (-28%) associated with LV and RV hypertrophy (+77%, + 51%) and greater increases of LV and RV wall thickening (+19%, + 57%), as well as LV dilation (+43%). A 12G stenosis results in compensated hypertrophy at 60 and 120 d; a 14G stenosis leads to compensated hypertrophy at 60 d and heart failure at 120 d.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".