Cooperativity between the Hydrophobic and Cross-linking Domains of Elastin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The principal protein component of the elastic fiber found in elastic tissues is elastin, an amorphous, cross-linked biopolymer that is assembled from a high molecular weight monomer. The hydrophobic and cross-linking domains of elastin have been considered separate and independent, such that changes to one region are not thought to affect the other. However, results from these solid-state 13C NMR experiments demonstrate that cooperativity in protein folding exists between the two domain types. The sequence of the EP20-24-24 polypeptide has three hydrophobic sequences from exons 20 and 24 of the soluble monomer tropoelastin, interspersed with cross-linking domains constructed from exons 21 and 23. In the middle of each cross-linking domain is a "hinge" sequence. When this pentapeptide is replaced with alanines, as in EP20-24-24[23U], its properties are changed. In addition to the expected increase in alpha-helical content and the resulting increase in rigidity of the cross-linking domains, changes to the organization of the hydrophobic regions are also observed. Using one-dimensional CPMAS (cross-polarization with magic angle spinning) techniques, including spectral editing and relaxation measurements, evidence for a change in dynamics to both domain types is observed. Furthermore, it is likely that the methyl groups of the leucines of the hydrophobic domains are also affected by the substitution to the hinge region of the cross-linking sequences. This cooperativity between the two domain types brings new questions to the phenomenon of coacervation in elastin polypeptides and strongly suggests that functional models for the protein must include a role for the cross-linking regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".