MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082867267 · doi:10.7202/016718ar

L’archéologue autopsié : la traversée de l’anatomo-clinique dans L’Écart de V. Y. Mudimbe

2007· article· fr· W2082867267 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Vincent Bruyère

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtRitePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le récit qui constitue L’Écart se donne comme une réponse à l’énigme de la mort d’Ahmed Nara – le personnage archéologue, au sens foucaldien du terme, du roman de Mudimbe – et à l’échec de l’autopsie censée en rendre compte. À partir de la contre-inscription dans le texte d’une telle figure du dispositif anatomo-clinique dégagé par Foucault dans Naissance de la clinique , cet article analyse en terme de « traversées », la reconduction et déconstruction narrative de ce discours sur l’intériorité et l’individu, afin d’identifier les stratégies et des tactiques d’une écriture du savoir sur une identité culturelle Africaine qui hérite de cadres épistémologiques occidentaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207