MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2082897043 · doi:10.1121/1.3587686

Multibeam sonar observations of hydrothermal flows at the Main Endeavour Field.

2011· article· en· W2082897043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter A. Rona, Karen G. Benis, Chris Jones, Darrell R. Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlumeSonarHydrothermal circulationHydrothermal ventObservatoryDoppler effectGeophysicsSeabedSeismologyOceanographyMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cabled Observatory Vent Imaging Sonar has been deployed at the Main Endeavour Node of the Canadian Neptune cabled observatory and has acquired data on plume and diffuse hydrothermal flows. Based on the Reson 7125 multibeam sonar and operating at 200 and 400 kHz, two-dimensional and three-dimensional time series are produced using plume backscattering, Doppler shift, and acoustic scintillation. Hydrothermal plumes and diffuse flow are important as agents of transfer of heat, chemicals, and biological material from the mantle and crust into the ocean in quantitatively significant amounts. High-frequency sonar measurements offer the possibility of inversion to obtain fluxes of central importance in these processes. Long-term time series, obtainable in cabled systems, allow observations of hydrothermal response to tidal, tectonic, and volcanic forcing. Examples will be given of plume bending due to currents, determination of entrainment of ambient water, time variation of diffuse flows, and Doppler determination of volume flux. [Work supported by NSF Grants Nos. OCE-0824612 and OCE-0825088.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→