Differences in psychological correlates of excess weight between adolescents and young adults in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a noticeable rise in the prevalence of excess weight in Canadian youth. Research has shown that certain psychological variables are implicated in the etiology of obesity. Hence, this study had the purpose of examining some of these variables among Canadian youth, and detecting differences between adolescents and young adults. Data from the Canadian Community Health Survey collected in 2003 was used to depict associations between selected psychological variables and excess weight among Canadians aged between 15 and 29 years. Results have shown that satisfaction with the way the body looks and satisfaction with life were inversely associated with excess weight in females. However, in males, satisfaction with life seemed to increase with age. For both genders, significant associations were observed between having a strong fear of being too fat, the respondent opinion of own weight and excess weight. Regarding weight control and eating habits, excess weight was associated with smoking less frequently in males aged between 25 and 29 years. The opposite was observed for females. For both genders, a positive association was observed between avoiding food because of calorie content and excess weight. Present findings highlight gender differences in body image perception, life satisfaction, and weight control practices. Moreover, changes or persistence in these variables between adolescents and young adults have also been detected in both males and females suggesting that early interventions might prevent the persistence of these psychological issues and habits in a older age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".