MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082902633 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.125320

Influence of a magnetic field on the current instability in a ballistic field-effect transistor

2001· article· en· W2082902633 on OpenAlexaff
M. S. Kushwaha, P. Vasilopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInstabilityMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsPlasmaWaves in plasmasElectronTwo-stream instabilityElectromagnetic electron waveElectromagnetic radiationOpticsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical investigation is made of the plasma-wave instability mechanism in a two-dimensional (2D) electron fluid in a ballistic field-effect transistor (FET) in the presence of a perpendicular magnetic field. The 2D electron fluid in the FET channel has been treated within the framework of hydrodynamics applicable to the shallow water waves. We show that a relatively low dc current should be unstable because of magnetoplasma-wave amplification due to the reflection of the wave from the device boundaries. Just as in the absence of the magnetic field the instability occurs for $0<{\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{0}<s$ and ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{0}<\ensuremath{-}s,$ where ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{0}$ is the local electron velocity and s the plasma-wave velocity. The external field B enhances this instability considerably as the imaginary part of the wave increases with B. Accordingly, the magnetic field can be used to compensate or overcome the stabilizing role of the external and/or internal friction on plasma-wave generation. Such a ballistic FET channel is a promising device for the generation of tunable electromagnetic radiation in the terahertz frequency range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207