Resistance microwelding of crossed Pt–10Ir and 316 LVM stainless steel wires
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistance microwelding of dissimilar materials such as Pt–10Ir and 316 low carbon vacuum melted stainless steel is becoming increasingly important for making electrical connections in medical devices. The joining of dissimilar materials increases flexibility in design while providing economic advantages, where more cost effective materials can be substituted for traditional materials. In this work, the performance of joints made using different electrode forces was studied by examining the surface morphology, cross-sections, joint break force and dynamic resistance measurements from resistance microwelding joints. Electrode sticking and excessive expulsion were observed with low electrode forces, whereas joints with undesirable cracks and notches were produced at higher electrode forces. Based on the analysis of single pulse welds, a new process variation using multiple pulses was developed, which improved the weld surface quality while obtaining a joint strength near 90% of the Pt–10Ir wire tensile strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it