MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082921415 · doi:10.1002/adma.200590019

Cover Picture: Colloidal Crystal Capillary Columns—Towards Optical Chromatography (Adv. Mater. 4/2005)

2005· paratext· en· W2082921415 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrich Kamp, Vladimir Kitaev, Georg von Freymann, Geoffrey A. Ozin, Scott A. Mabury

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2005
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWavelengthRefractive indexPhotonic crystalColloidSPHERESStationary phaseCapillary actionOpticsOptoelectronicsChromatographyComposite materialChemical engineeringChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cover illustration, designed by Ludovico Cademartiri, is an artistic rendering of novel micro‐ and nanobore chromatographic columns, as reported by Ozin and co‐workers on p. 438. The three‐dimensional periodic arrangement of the building blocks, solid spheres or air‐spheres, constituting the chromatographic stationary phase allows wavelength‐selective interaction of electromagnetic radiation with the stationary phase. The photonic stop band responsible for the structural color of the column is monitored spectroscopically and shifts of its wavelength, generated by minute refractive index changes within a mobile phase (here represented by alkane homologues), can be immediately detected at any point along and around the column due to the exceptional structural uniformity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2000.085

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207