MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082929604 · doi:10.1021/la0117146

Rigid Interior of Styrene−Maleic Anhydride Copolymer Aggregates Probed by Fluorescence Spectroscopy

2002· article· en· W2082929604 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Claracq, Sergio F. C. R. Santos, Jean Duhamel, Christophe Dumousseaux, Jean‐Marc Corpart

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerMicelleFluorescenceFluorescence spectroscopyMaleic anhydrideStyreneRadius of gyrationExcimerMonomerPyreneMaterials scienceFluorescence anisotropyPolymer chemistryChemistryHydrodynamic radiusAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Quenching (fluorescence)PolymerPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several fluorescence techniques have been applied to characterize the aggregates of styrene−maleic anhydride copolymers (SMA). The formation of hydrophobic microdomains was confirmed by monitoring the I 1 / I 3 ratios of pyrene dissolved in SMA solutions. Fluorescence quenching experiments indicate that protective quenching is occurring. The excimer-to-monomer ratio of di(1-pyrenylmethyl) ether and stopped-flow fluorescence measurements show that the interior of these SMA aggregates is extremely rigid, much more than that of typical surfactant micelles. Fluorescence anisotropy was applied to determine the hydrodynamic radius of these aggregates which was found to equal 1.7 ± 0.2 nm, in qualitative agreement with earlier measurements by small-angle X-ray scattering and small-angle neutron scattering. SMA aggregates have sizes similar to that of typical surfactant micelles, but their interior is frozen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207