MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing Carrier-Phase Differential Global Positioning System Networks with Partial Derivative Algorithms

2002· article· en· W2082971049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surveying Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsDifferential GPSGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceDifferential (mechanical device)Real-time computingAlgorithmPhase (matter)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centimeter-to-decimeter-level positioning accuracy from the global positioning system (GPS) requires the use of carrier-phase measurements. The system is generally operated in a double differential mode in which a nearby reference station is used to calibrate for errors in the satellite differential measurements. For large-scale applications, a network of multiple differential reference stations is necessary. This paper describes the major errors affecting differential GPS (DGPS) applications, how a network of reference stations can be used to estimate these errors, and one method of implementing carrier-phase network differential GPS (CP-NDGPS) using partial derivative algorithms (PDAs). PDAs can be implemented by a network service provider and are used to estimate spatial and nonspatial signal errors that cannot be measured by a single GPS reference station. For networks having numerous reference stations, a PDA is an efficient method of transmitting information though a data link to the network users. Such a system is also capable of reducing DGPS errors. Of the networks studied during this project, DGPS errors were reduced 30 to 90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it