MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083027023 · doi:10.1021/jp711766v

Standard Partial Molar Volumes of Some Aqueous Alkanolamines and Alkoxyamines at Temperatures up to 325 °C:  Functional Group Additivity in Polar Organic Solutes under Hydrothermal Conditions

2008· article· en· W2083027023 on OpenAlexaff
E. Bulemela, Peter R. Tremaine

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAqueous solutionAdditive functionPolarHydrothermal circulationGroup (periodic table)ChemistryMolarFunctional groupThermodynamicsInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringMathematicsGeologyPolymerMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apparent molar volumes of dilute aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), triethanolamine (TEA), N,N −dimethylethanolamine (DMEA), ethylethanolamine (EAE), 2-diethylethanolamine (2-DEEA), and 3-methoxypropylamine (3-MPA) and their salts were measured at temperatures from 150 to 325 °C and pressures as high as 15 MPa. The results were corrected for the ionization and used to obtain the standard partial molar volumes,. A three-parameter equation of state was used to describe the temperature and pressure dependence of the standard partial molar volumes. The fitting parameters were successfully divided into functional group contributions at all temperatures to obtain the standard partial molar volume contributions. Including literature results for alcohols, carboxylic acids, and hydroxycarboxylic acids yielded the standard partial molar volume contributions of the functional groups >CH−, >CH 2, −CH 3, −OH, −COOH, −O−, ⪫N, >NH, −NH 2, −COO - Na +, −NH 3 + Cl -, >NH 2 + Cl -, and ⪫NH + Cl - over the range (150 °C ≤ t ≤ 325 °C). These allow predictions of the standard partial molar volume of aqueous organic solutes composed of these groups at temperatures up to ∼310 °C and pressures of 10−20 MPa to within a precision of ±5 cm 3 ·mol -1 . The model could not be extended to higher temperatures because of uncertainties caused by thermal decomposition. At temperatures above ∼250 °C, the order of the group contributions tochanges from that observed at 25 °C, to become increasingly consistent with the polarity of each functional group. The effect of the dipole moment of each molecule on the contribution tofrom long-range solvent polarization was calculated from the multipole expansion of the Born equation using dipole moments estimated from restricted Hartree−Fock calculations with Gaussian 03 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT) and the Onsager reaction-field approximation for solvent effects. Below 325 °C, the dipole contribution was found to be less than 2 cm 3 ·mol -1 for all the solute molecules studied. At higher temperatures and pressures near steam saturation, the effect is much larger and may explain anomalies in functional group additivity observed in small, very polar solutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207