MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083028953 · doi:10.1029/2006gl026385

Vertical seismoelectric profiling in a borehole penetrating glaciofluvial sediments

2006· article· en· W2083028953 on OpenAlex
J. Christian Dupuis, Karl E. Butler

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBoreholeAmplitudeLithologyVertical seismic profilePermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityPetrophysicsSeismologyMineralogyPetrologyGeotechnical engineeringGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismoelectric signals have been measured as a function of depth in a borehole penetrating glaciofluvial sands, silts, and glacial till using a broadband surface seismic source, and a downhole electrode array. Transient electric field pulses, with amplitudes of 1 to 4 μV/m accompanied the arrival of seismic P‐waves at the electrodes but no simultaneous interfacial signals were observed above the noise floor of approximately 0.2 μV/m. The co‐seismic effect was strongest in a sand and gravel layer where its amplitude is consistent with the predictions of a simplified theoretical model. Normalization of the amplitude logs by measurements of seismic particle velocity and electrical conductivity enhanced their sensitivity to changes in lithology and porosity. The results of this experiment suggest that co‐seismic seismoelectric effects show potential as a porosity/permeability logging tool in the borehole environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it