An ab initio study of the potential energy surfaces for the collision between a Cs atom and an I<sub>2</sub> molecule
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Cs + I2 collision system, a systematic theoretical study is first reported using the ab initio method. Three of eight possible channels are considered. The nonadiabatic coupling between the covalent state and the ionic one is calculated from different angles, especially the T-shape collision. The complete ion-pair formation potential energy surfaces of the T-shape collision in two electronic states (ionic 2B2 state and covalent 2A1 state) and the reactive surface of the linear collision are constructed at the QCISD(T)/SDD level. The main features of potential energy surfaces, such as the minimum energy reaction path, the crossing radius (Rc), and energy minimum geometries, are analyzed. The cross section of this titled system is calculated based on the harpoon mechanism and compared with the available experimental data and those obtained for the M + I2 (M = Li, Na) systems.Key words: ab initio two-state potential energy surfaces, nonadiabatic coupling, ion-pair formation, cross section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".