Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the effect of humidity on the electronic properties of DNA base pairs. We found that the hydrogen links of the nucleobases with water molecules lead to a shift of the pi electron density from carbon atoms to nitrogen atoms and can change the symmetry of the wave function for some nucleobases. As a result, the orbital energies are shifted which leads to a decrease in the potential barrier for the hole transfer between the G-C and A-T pairs from 0.7 eV for the dehydrated case to 0.123 eV for the hydrated. More importantly, the pi electron density redistribution activated by hydration is enhanced by the intrastrand interactions. This leads to a modification of the nucleobase chemical structures from the covalent type to a resonance structure with separated charges, where some pi electrons are not locked up into the covalent bonds. Within the (G-C)(2) sequences, there is overlapping of the electronic clouds of such unlocked electrons belonging to the stacked guanines, that significantly increases the electron coupling between them to V(DA)=0.095 eV against the V(DA)=0.025 eV for the dehydrated case. Consequently, the charge transfer between two guanines within the (G-C)(2) sequences is increased by 250 times due to hydration. The presence of nonbonded electrons suppress the band gap up to approximately 3.0 eV, that allows us to consider DNA as a narrow band gap semiconductor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".