MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083040927 · doi:10.1021/mp900258z

Interplay of Transporters and Enzymes in Drug and Metabolite Processing

2009· review· en· W2083040927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTransporterDrug metabolismMetabolismBiologyEnzymeSecretionMetaboliteDrugCatabolismBiochemistryCellMetabolic pathwayCell biologyPharmacologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review highlights the "interplay" between enzymes and transporters, essential components of eliminating organs for drug removal. The understanding of the interplay is important in terms of deciphering the change of one eliminatory pathway on compensatory mechanisms in drug disposal, and, ultimately, their importance in drug-drug interactions. Controversy existed on the explanation underlying the interplay between transporters and enzymes in the Caco-2 cell monolayer or cell culture systems, but less so on eliminating organs such as the intestine and liver. For the Caco-2 system, the increase in the mean residence time (MRT) accompanying increased secretion had been construed as the basis for increased metabolism. We hold the opposite view and assert that increased secretion should evoke a decrease in metabolism due to the competition between the enzyme and apical efflux transporter for the drug within the cell. To illustrate this point, simulations on the MRT, fraction of dose metabolized (f(met)) and the extraction ratio (ER) as defined by various investigators under linear and nonlinear metabolic conditions were compared to observed data and the trends upon induction/inhibition of secretion. The conclusion is that the f(met) is the more appropriate index to reflect the extent of metabolism in transporter-enzyme interplay, since the parameter captures drug metabolism in the cell when its contents in the apical, cell, and basolateral compartments or the entire dose is considered to be available for metabolism. This parameter for metabolism (f(met)) bears a reciprocal relationship to the secretory intrinsic clearance and is in concordance with the notion that both the enzyme and apical transporter compete for the cellular substrate within. For the liver and intestine, several physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models that contain transporters and enzymes were utilized, together with the solved equations for the area under the curve (AUC), metabolic, excretory, and total clearance (CL) to shed meaningful insight of how the inhibition of one pathway can result in a higher AUC and therefore a reduced total clearance for drug, but a higher apparent clearance of the alternate pathway; induction of the same pathway would lead to an increased total clearance but decreased drug AUC, and reduced clearance of the alternate pathway. The use of an increased MRT to explain increased extents of metabolism upon increased apical excretion is not tenable in these organs or "open systems" since the MRT of drug in the cell is reduced with irreversible loss from biliary excretion or hastened gastrointestinal transit of the secreted drug in the lumen. Data in the literature for the Caco-2 system, knockout animals and organ perfusion systems were discussed in relation to these concepts on clearance based on fundamental, pharmacokinetic theory. The shortcomings in data interpretation were discussed. The general conclusion is that a reciprocal relationship exists between the clearances related to enzymes and apical transporters due to their competition for the substrate within the cell, and is a relationship independent of the MRT of drug in the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it