MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083047663 · doi:10.1115/detc2009-86213

Self Motions of the Pantopteron

2009· preprint· en· W2083047663 on OpenAlexaff
Se ́bastien Briot, Ilian A. Bonev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPantographCartesian coordinate systemComputer scienceActuatorParallel manipulatorGravitational singularityRobotControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMechanical engineeringMathematicsGeometryControl (management)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the self motions of a novel 3-DOF fully decoupled translational parallel robot, called the Pantopteron, are presented. The Pantopteron is similar to the well-known Cartesian parallel manipulator (Tripteron), but due to the use of pantograph linkages, an amplification effect is achieved. Therefore, equipped with the same actuators, the mobile platform of the Pantopteron moves faster than that of the Tripteron. This amplification is defined by the magnification factor of the pantograph linkages. The self motions are probably the most critical types of singularities a manipulator can meet. Therefore it is of utmost importance to have a good knowledge of them. Design considerations are also discussed in order to create Pantopterons without self motions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207