MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083049782 · doi:10.1080/18811248.2003.9715371

The Crack Tip Solution Chemistry in Sensitized Stainless Steel in Simulated Boiling Water Reactor Water Studied Using a Microsampling Technique

2003· article· en· W2083049782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Science and Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsBoiling water reactorStress corrosion crackingBoilingCrackingCorrosionWater chemistryChemistryPressurized water reactorLight-water reactorMetallurgyMaterials scienceComposite materialNuclear engineeringEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to obtain a better understanding of the mechanism of stress corrosion cracking, an improved microsampling technique was applied to measurements of the local solution chemistry at the growing tip of a stress corrosion crack.Efforts were made to improve the microsampling technique to obtain more accurate information about the crack tip solution chemistry and apply it to measurements of the crack tip solution chemistry in sensitized 304L stainless steel in simulated Boiling Water Reactor water.The improved technique was used to study the effects of dissolved oxygen, testing temperature and exposure time on the concentration of harmful anions at the crack tip.The microsampled solution from the crack tip was analyzed by a Capillary Electrophoresis system.The results as well as the effects of the improved technique were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it