Selectively iterative particle filtering and its applications for target tracking in WSNs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle filters (PF) have been widely used in the estimation of the state transition and observation of non-linear/non-Gaussian systems, and samples degeneracy is the main issue of particle filters. In this paper, a novel PF - selectively iterative particle filter (SIPF) is proposed for target tracking in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). There are two novel strategies in SIPF, the statistics based threshold and particles refining. The key insight of SIPF is from an experimental observation that, the more suitable divergence of particles can yield the better estimation. The performance of the proposed SIPF is tested on two theoretical models, and then it is used in a target tracking issue in WSN in the distributed model. Experimental results show that the proposed SIPF can greatly improve the accuracy of object tracking, and in theoretical models the estimation error is only about 10%, while in practical models is only about 25% compared to other existing 9 filtering methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it