MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pedometer Ownership, Motivation, and Walking

2007· article· en· W2083058583 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tanya R. Berry, Shawn N. Fraser, John C. Spence, Enrique Garcíá Bengoechea

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedometerSalaryRecreationFoundation (evidence)DowntownPsychologyPhysical activityGeographyPhysical therapyPolitical scienceMedicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsTanya R. Berry This research was supported in part by a grant from the Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation. Tanya R. Berry receives salary support from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Please address all correspondence concerning this article to Tanya R. Berry, E-424 Van Vliet Centre, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H9

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Quarterly for Exercise and SportSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207