The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 14, No. 2 ARTICLESThe Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:keMorden C. Lazarus and Brian HallMorden C. LazarusSearch for more papers by this author and Brian HallSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:5 May 2010https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2010.14205AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byANZSOC 23rd Annual Conference, Alice Springs, September, 2010. Aboriginal justice issues – trying for new approaches, while clinging to the old: Our shared experiences18 August 2011 | Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Vol. 44, No. 2 Volume 14Issue 2Mar 2010 Information© 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Morden C. Lazarus and Brian Hall.The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Mar 2010.95-99.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2010.14205Published in Volume: 14 Issue 2: May 5, 2010PDF download
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".