MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of expired carbon dioxide, oxygen and volume in conjunction with pretest probability estimation as a method to diagnose and exclude pulmonary venous thromboembolism

2006· article· en· W2083066143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExpirationReceiver operating characteristicConfidence intervalTidal volumeLikelihood ratios in diagnostic testingExhalationPulmonary embolismEmergency departmentNuclear medicineExpired airPre- and post-test probabilitySurgeryAnesthesiaRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The classical alveolar pCO(2)-pO(2) relationship predicts that pulmonary embolism (PE) causes a low ratio of pCO(2)/pO(2) at end expiration. Our purpose was to define a simple protocol to collect expired pCO(2)/pO(2) to diagnose PE. Emergency department patients with suspected PE were enrolled. Clinical pretest probabilities for PE were estimated prior to diagnostic testing using the Canadian score and clinicians' unstructured estimate. Patients provided three 30-s periods of tidal breathing, separated by three deep exhalations. Expired pCO(2), pO(2) and breath volume were measured. All patients underwent standardized objective testing for PE including 90-day follow-up. Diagnosis (PE+) required anticoagulation for image-proven PE within 90 days. RESULTS: Of 200 patients enrolled, 178 were included in final analysis (24 PE+). The mean coefficient of variability for the deep-exhaled and end-tidal pCO(2)/pO(2) ratios were 6.8 +/- 6.7 and 7.5 +/- 6.8%, respectively. Mean pCO(2)/pO(2) ratios were stable throughout the collection periods in both methods. When compared with the deep-exhaled ratio, the end-tidal mean ratio demonstrated slightly better diagnostic utility by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The end-tidal ratios were divided into four interval likelihood ratios and coupled with pretest probability from the two methods to generate three sets of posttest probabilities. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated good overall diagnostic performance (areas under the curves >0.88) for both posttest probability sets. CONCLUSION: This preliminary work demonstrates that the end-tidal pCO(2)/pO(2) averaged from 30 s of breathing can produce clinically relevant likelihood ratios for the diagnosis and exclusion of PE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it