Time, Space, and Construction: Starting with Auspicious Carpentry (开工大吉) in the Vernacular Dong Dwelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| March 01 2011 Time, Space, and Construction: Starting with Auspicious Carpentry (开工大吉) in the Vernacular Dong Dwelling Xuemei Li; Xuemei Li Ryerson University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Kendra Schank Smith Kendra Schank Smith Ryerson University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2011) 70 (1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2011.70.1.07 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Xuemei Li, Kendra Schank Smith; Time, Space, and Construction: Starting with Auspicious Carpentry (开工大吉) in the Vernacular Dong Dwelling. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 March 2011; 70 (1): 7–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2011.70.1.07 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search Keywords: Chinese ritual, Dong dwelling, time and space, Chinese construction The traditional homeland of the Dong nationality is located in the adjacent mountainous areas of Guizhou, Hunan, and the Guangxi Autonomous Region in southwest China (Figure 1). The total Dong population exceeds 2.5 million: 1,400,344 inhabit Guizhou, 757,130 in Hunan, 295,673 in Guangxi, and 54,798 in Hubei.1 Located in mountain valleys, Dong villages are protected from strong winds and enjoy a warm and humid climate with an average temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit (20 degrees C) (Figure 2). Agriculture is dependent on irrigation. Rice is planted on the flat fields, while cotton, tea bushes, and vegetables are grown on terraces on the hills. The mountainsides are covered with fir, pine, and fruit trees.2 The Dong are among the Chinese ethnic groups that live in elevated, multistory wooden houses called ganlans. In the Dong community,... © 2011 by the Society of Architectural Historians2011 You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".