Metamorphosis in Chironomids, More than Mercury Supply, Controls Methylmercury Transfer to Fish in High Arctic Lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lake-dwelling Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) are monitored internationally as a sentinel species for effects of atmospheric mercury deposition on Arctic fresh waters. We investigated the control of mercury supply and biological processes on the methylmercury (MeHg) content of their main food, aquatic chironomids, in 22 lakes and ponds in the Canadian High Arctic. Total mercury (THg) concentrations in sediment (corrected for organic matter content) increased with drainage basin size, suggesting a gradient in mercury loading among study sites. MeHg concentrations in sediment and water were low and relatively uniform along this THg supply gradient suggesting MeHg production in High Arctic lakes is weakly coupled to inorganic mercury supply. Metamorphosis was a key biological process that concentrated MeHg in adult chironomids 1.7-2.9 times more than in immature stages. Drainage basin size, environmental mercury levels, and habitat characteristics were also significant factors but they explained less variation in chironomid MeHg concentration than their degree of maturity. Chironomid larvae, pupae, and adults are distinct mercury sources for fish, and we provide evidence from nitrogen stable isotopes and published feeding studies that suggest differential consumption of these stages may affect MeHg uptake by Arctic char. We conclude that biological and food web processes have a greater impact on MeHg transfer to fish than atmospheric mercury deposition in High Arctic lakes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".