MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083076397 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.1482

La grandparentalité chez les enfants du baby-boom au Québec : une nouvelle logique des rapports intergénérationnels

2008· article· fr· W2083076397 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ignace Olazabal, Anne-Caroline Desplanques

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les premiers-nés du baby-boom constituent une génération charnière en raison de leur poids démographique, de leur avancement en âge et leur position et leurs responsabilités au sein de la chaîne intergénérationnelle. On a pu observer que les grands-parents québécois de la génération du baby-boom s’impliquent, indépendamment de l’origine ethnoculturelle et de la classe sociale, d’une façon relativement inédite dans le développement de leurs petits-enfants. Il apparaît ainsi utile de comprendre leur situation à l’intérieur de la chaîne générationnelle puisqu’ils semblent observer des rapports familialistes d’un type nouveau. Nous pouvons en effet parler d’un lien électif qui primerait la solidarité mécanique (on choisit comment et dans quelle mesure on s’implique). Cet engagement va à l’encontre des idées véhiculées dans la société contemporaine sur les baby-boomers, tout en nous amenant à « réfléchir aux valeurs qui sous-tendent les choix de nos sociétés » par l’entremise d’une nouvelle éthique des relations intergénérationnelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207