MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083086166 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.1498

Les camps de Jales (1790-1792), épisodes contre-revolutionnaires ?

2004· article· fr· W2083086166 on OpenAlexaff
François de Jouvenel

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En juillet 1792, l’armée du Comte de Saillans cherche à « allumer la flamme de la Contre-Révolution » dans le sud de la France. L’insurrection est immédiatement écrasée dans le sang par les patriotes. Pourtant, au mois d’août 1790 et en février 1791, les deux premiers camps de Jalès avaient semblé manifester la force de la Contre-Révolution naissante dans les départements de la Lozère, de l’Ardèche et du Gard. Cet article revient sur les trois premiers camps de Jalès pour montrer que la conspiration de Saillans, ouvertement contre-révolutionnaire, ne réussit pas à s’inscrire dans la continuité des deux épisodes précédents. Ceux-ci sont des réactions catholiques aux rumeurs de menaces protestantes dans des terres soumises aux tensions confessionnelles. Organisés ou utilisés par certains élus locaux, ces rassemblements s’inscrivent dans les luttes internes aux communautés d’habitants et se nourrissent des conflits qui se développent lors de la mise en place des pouvoirs locaux.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207