MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083086495 · doi:10.1021/jo051042e

The Bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl Group as an Effective N-Protecting Group and Site-Selective Control Element in Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Reaction of Diazoamides

2005· article· en· W2083086495 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew G. H. Wee, Sammy C. Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCarbenoidSubstituentTrimethylsilylIntramolecular forceRegioselectivityChemoselectivityMedicinal chemistryRhodiumStereochemistryInsertion reactionAmideCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intramolecular rhodium(II)-carbenoid-mediated C-H insertion reaction of structurally varied N-bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl,N-substituted diazoamides is studied. It has been found that in tertiary diazoamides the N-bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl (N-BTMSM) group is effective for conformational control about the amide N-C(O) bond; C-H insertion occurs at the other N-substituent. In C(alpha)-branched diazoamides, the N-BTMSM is found also to exert its influence on the conformational preference about the N-C(alpha) bond, which affects the regioselectivity of the C-H insertion in these systems. In unbranched diazoamides, inherent electronic effects of the N-substituent affect the regio- and chemoselectivity of the reaction; however, in branched diazoamides, electronic effects of the N-substituent and the alpha-substituent at the carbenoid carbon are subtle, but important in the deciding the eventual outcome of the reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207