MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083087079 · doi:10.1080/10640260008251240

The impact of eating disorders on family relationships

2000· article· en· W2083087079 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adrienne Gilbert, Susan Shaw, Margaret K. Notar

Bibliographic record

VenueEating Disorders · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsGrand River HospitalUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionPsychologyEating disordersQualitative researchClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having a child in crisis with an eating disorder impacts the entire family as well as the child. The family's emotional involvement, as well as such changes in routine involving appointments with thera-pists and support groups, all cause disruption to normal patterns and to family relationships. The purpose of this study was to investigate the challenges that parents face and the changes that occur, particularly in relationships, when a child is diagnosed with an eating disorder, and how parents cope with these changes. A detailed questionnaire using both quantitative and qualitative questions was completed by 52 mothers in Ontario. The findings indicated that there is a significant impact on relationships correlated with age of child, personal leisure, and level of confusion in the family. The findings also showed contrasts in the way families cope with having a child in crisis, either very negatively or very positively. The qualitative anecdotes describe the tremendous strains and changes in patterns within families particularly during the initial period of diagnosis. The parents provide helpful recommendations for researchers, practitioners, and service providers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEating DisordersSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207