Melting behavior, isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of nylon 1111
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of nylon 1111 was extensively studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The equilibrium melting temperature of nylon 1111 was determined to be 188°C. In this article, the Avrami equation was used to describe the isothermal crystallization behavior of nylon 1111. On the basis of the DSC results, the Avrami exponent, n, was determined to be around 3 during the isothermal crystallization process. Nonisothermal crystallization was analyzed using both the Avrami equation as modified by Jeziorny and an equation suggested by Mo. The larger value of the Avrami exponent, n , during the nonisothermal crystallization process indicates that the development of nucleation and crystal growth are more complicated during the nonisothermal crystallization for nylon 1111, and that the nucleation mode might simultaneously include both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleations. The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization activation energies of nylon 1111 were determined to be −132 kJ/mol and −121 kJ/mol using the Arrhenius equation and the Kissinger method, respectively. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".