MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083132504 · doi:10.1115/detc2009-87407

A Variable Spring Using a Tensegrity Prism

2009· article· en· W2083132504 on OpenAlexafffund
Mojtaba Azadi, Saeed Behzadipour, Gary Faulkner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTensegrityDeflection (physics)StiffnessPrismSpring (device)Structural engineeringVariable (mathematics)Displacement (psychology)Internal forcesEngineeringPhysicsOpticsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prestressable pin jointed structures are statically indeterminate but kinematically they can be either overdeterminate or indeterminate. Tensegrities are special cases of the latter class. Although, all prestressable structures have variable stiffness that can be controlled by prestress, it is only a subgroup of them such as tensegrities that make effective variable stiffness springs. An N-gon tensegrity prism is investigated as a basis for making a variable stiffness spring called Tensegrity Prism spring. The appropriate deflection direction is found and force-displacement and stiffness equations of a translational tensegrity prism spring with n bars are found. In addition, the main characteristics of a variable tensegrity prism spring and the methods that improve them are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207