MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083172734 · doi:10.1145/1621076.1621080

Fitness landscape analysis for resource allocation in multiuser OFDM based cognitive radio systems

2009· article· en· W2083172734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemetic algorithmOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceCognitive radioResource allocationEvolutionary algorithmMathematical optimizationLocal search (optimization)Genetic algorithmFitness landscapeOptimization problemWirelessArtificial intelligenceMachine learningAlgorithmMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive Radio (CR) is a promising technique for improving the spectrum efficiency in future wireless communication networks. In this paper, dynamic resource allocation in a Multiuser Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (MU-OFDM) based CR system is investigated. Dynamic resource allocation in MU-OFDM CR systems is a computationally complex combinatorial optimization problem. Memetic algorithms (MAs), which are hybrid evolutionary algorithms with local searches, have been shown to outperform traditional algorithms for many combinatorial optimization problems. However, the performance of MAs is highly dependent on the choice of the local search and evolutionary operators. This choice should be based on the characteristics of the problem at hand. Fitness landscape is an important technique for analyzing the behavior of combinatorial optimization problems. Based on fitness landscape analysis, appropriate local search and evolutionary operators are selected for the proposed MA. Simulation results show that the proposed memetic algorithm provides better performance than existing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it