MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083194692 · doi:10.1021/ac060228q

Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy of the Photosynthetic Reaction Center of<i>Rhodobacter</i><i>sphaeroides</i>in Different Environmental Systems

2006· article· en· W2083194692 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Longobardi, Pinalysa Cosma, Francesco Milano, Angela Agostiano, Janine Mauzeroll, Allen J. Bard

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRhodobacter sphaeroidesPhotosynthetic reaction centreChemistryScanning electrochemical microscopyRedoxMembraneElectron transferPurple bacteriaScanning electron microscopeElectrochemistryRhodobacterPhotosynthesisKineticsChemical engineeringBiophysicsPhotochemistryElectrodeInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryBiochemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work uses a scanning electrochemical microscopy technique to study systems containing the membrane-bound reaction center protein (RC) from the purple photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter spheroides to chromatophores (spherical reorganization of cell membrane following its mechanical rupture) and liposomes (reconstituted membrane systems at lower degree of complexity). Scanning electrochemical microscopy is a useful tool to investigate redox processes involving a RC, because the effective heterogeneous rate constants for the redox reaction with different mediators can be measured. The technique is also able to provide information on the role of the outer cell membrane permeation on the kinetics of the electron-transfer processes and to obtain more insight into the nature of the species involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207