MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083200690 · doi:10.1145/1132736.1132740

État de l'art des techniques de présentation d'information sur écran d'assistant numérique personnel

2006· article· fr· W2083200690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePresentation (obstetrics)Task (project management)Human–computer interactionTypologyInterface (matter)MultimediaUser interfaceInformation needsWorld Wide WebComputer graphics (images)EngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of user interfaces on PDAs is increasingly challenging for developers as the need to view large quantities of information increases. The small size of the screen makes it difficult to have an overall picture of the content of the interface as well as of a complete view of all pieces of information that the mobile user needs to accomplish his/her task. This paper presents a state of the art of the different techniques of presentation on PDA screens that have been developed in response to the lack of space on these screens. By so doing, we also present a typology of techniques of information presentation on PDAs and several evaluation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207