Instability in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Direct Lateral Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Instability after a total hip arthroplasty is a serious complication. Dislocation rates as much as 6.5% after posterior approaches have been reported within the past decade. For this reason, the authors use the direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. A review of the arthroplasty database yielded 1515 primary total hip arthroplasties done via a direct lateral approach in 1333 patients. These arthroplasties were done within a 10-year period and patients with followup data less than 12 months were excluded. At the most recent examination, 11.6% of the patients had a moderate or severe limp and 2.5% had severe heterotopic ossification. Only six hips (0.4%) had a dislocation or episode of instability. Three patients had more than one dislocation and required revision surgery. The results of the current study show that dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty almost can be eliminated using the direct lateral approach. The associated risks of heterotopic ossification or limp are acceptable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".