Experimental analysis of tensile force of individualized stents for microvascular anastomoses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this project was to investigate the fundamental idea of the possibility of anastomosing small blood vessels in microvascular transplant procedures by an individualized stent known from coronary angioplasty. We investigated the influence of length, dilation and differences in fabrication of the newly developed balloon-expandable stent on the tensile force of stented anastomoses. Various gripping devices were tested and validated to investigate how the length, dilatation and differences in fabrication of the newly developed stent influence the tensile force of the stented anastomosis. Overall, 66 arteries of thiel-fixed human cadavers were investigated, divided into 11 groups. The median tensile force in sutured anastomoses was 2.96 N. The stented anastomoses with 24 mm stents and Ø 3.5 mm dilation attained approximately two-thirds of F(max)-values compared with conventional sutured anastomoses. If the stent was less dilated or had a shorter length, the maximum tensile force of the anastomosis was lower. Recent developments with an inversely oriented stent structure are expected to achieve even higher tensile force values. Further research in stent design to reduce leakage is necessary. A reduction of stent and catheter dimension is also needed to enhance the implantation method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".