BarTLB: Barren page resistant TLB for managed runtime languages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work observes that many translation lookaside buffer (TLB) misses in Java workloads originate from barren pages. That is, pages that contain mostly dead objects sprinkled with only a few live objects. Barren pages experience only a few accesses every time they are touched thrashing a conventional TLB. This work characterizes the barren page phenomenon and proposes (1) a low-cost barren page identification technique, and (2) two simple, low-cost techniques for improving TLB performance: (a) The Barren Page First (BPF) replacement policy extends an existing TLB replacement policy to prefer barren pages on evictions. (b) Selective In-Cache Translation Caching (SICTC) avoids installing barren pages in the TLB by augmenting one way of a virtually-indexed, physically-tagged L1 data cache with virtual tags. For all workloads considered BPF and SICTC not only prove robust but also improve performance by 1.7% and 5.1% on average and by up to 4.6% and 12.0% respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".