MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of bacterial spot (<i>Xanthomonas cucurbitae</i>) of pumpkin in Ontario, Canada

2014· article· en· W2083237984 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl L. Trueman, E. Roddy, Paul H. Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCucurbita pepoHorticultureGenBankSpotsBotanyLeaf spotXanthomonasVeterinary medicineBacteriaGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In August 2012, leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo cvs. Gladiator, Aladdin, Apollo, and Super Hero) in Kent County, Ontario, Canada were observed with 1-4 mm irregular-shaped light brown to tan lesions, often with a chlorotic halo. Mature fruit had 2-4 mm light brown to tan sunken lesions with dark borders (Fig. 1), and later developed severe soft rot. Approximately 35 ha were affected with more than 50% of foliage and 60% of fruit damaged. Isolations were made from fruit using the method described by Cuppels et al. (1) but with tryptic soy agar. More than 95% of colonies isolated were opaque, light to bright yellow, glistening, circular, and flat. Isolates were gram-negative. Substrate utilisation profiles (Biolog, Hayward, CA) of Ontario isolates CT12PT1A and CT12PT3 were compared with those described for Xanthomonas DNA homology groups (Vauterin et al. 4). Utilisation patterns of the 95 substrates in the BIOLOG assay for CT12PT3 and CT12PT1A had 96.8% and 94.7% identity with members of Group 8 (X. cucurbitae), and both had 95.8% identity with at least one of the three X. cucurbitae isolates reported by Dutta et al. (2) (Dutta, pers. communication). The 16S DNA sequences of CT12PT3 and CT12PT1A were obtained with primers designed by the Pest Diagnostic Clinic, University of Guelph (5'GCYTAACACATGCAAGTCGA-3' and 5'-GTGTGTACAAGNCCCGGGAA-3'). A BLAST search of the GenBank database revealed that both sequences (GenBank Accession Nos. KJ817203 and KJ817204) had 100% nt identity to the 16S DNA sequences of Xanthomonas dyei (NR_104949), Xanthomonas pisi (AB680442), Xanthononas vesicatoria (AY288080 and AF123088) and Xanthononas cucurbitae (AB680438). In addition, 928 bp of the gyrase subunit B gene (gyrB) was sequenced with primers gyrB-F and gyrB-R (Hamza et al., 3). Both Ontario isolates (KJ817205 and KJ817206) had 100% nt identity with gyrB of X. cucurbitae (HM569161.1 and HM569162.1). The next closest matches were Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citrumelo (CP002914.1) and Xanthomonas campestris pv. raphani (CP002789.1), with 94% nt identity. A neighbour-joining tree from a ClustalW multiple sequence alignment of the overlapping regions of these gyrB sequences and 14 other Xanthomonas species showed that sequences from both Ontario isolates clustered only with HM569161 and HM569162 with high bootstrapping values (Fig. 2). These results strongly suggest the isolates are X. cucurbitae. To confirm pathogenicity of the isolates, a bacterial suspension (1 times 107 cfu/ml) of each isolate was applied to the leaves of four pumpkin plants (cv. Howden) using a hand-held mist sprayer. Plants were covered for 24h under a translucent plastic box and maintained under artificial light with 16h day length at 24-28°C. Small lesions with slight chlorotic haloes were observed on all inoculated plants 10 days post inoculation (Fig. 3). No symptoms were observed in the water control. Bacteria were isolated from lesions as previously described. The gyrB sequences of these isolates had 100% nt identity to the original isolates, and the BIOLOG substrate utilisation tests showed 100% and 98.9% similarity to CT12PT3 and CT12PT1A respectively. The presence of bacterial spot caused by X. cucurbitae poses a new threat to pumpkin and squash production in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207