MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083254917 · doi:10.7202/018993ar

L’intégration a des limites, pas l’école inclusive !

2008· article· fr· W2083254917 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Serge Thomazet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’expression école inclusive tend à remplacer le terme intégration pour désigner la scolarité des élèves à besoins particuliers dans les écoles ordinaires. Nous proposons dans ce texte une analyse qui prendra appui sur l’évolution constatée aux États-Unis, pour mieux comprendre les raisons de l’émergence d’un nouveau terme et les avantages qu’il y aurait à l’adopter. Nous montrerons notamment l’intérêt de pouvoir nommer, sous le terme d’ école inclusive , des pratiques qui permettent de scolariser différemment, dans une école pour tous, des enfants et adolescents, quels que soient leur handicap ou leurs difficultés, et de dépasser ainsi les limites de l’intégration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.444
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.027 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207