MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083257077 · doi:10.7202/018794ar

Saint-Exupéry thérapeute

2008· article· fr· W2083257077 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Frédéric Caumont

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiques · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La renommée du Petit Prince est telle que ce récit peut être envisagé comme la transcription symbolique d’une expérience psychique primordiale. L’hypothèse que nous développons plus précisément consiste à repérer dans cette histoire une allégorie du processus de maturation chez le sujet et nous proposons de la traiter comme s’il s’agissait d’un matériau clinique. Il apparaît que Saint-Exupéry nous livre à travers cette narration sa compréhension de l’aide psychique en nous exposant une véritable démarche de soins à l’adresse d’un enfant en souffrance. Il contribue ainsi à nous éclairer sur la nature des processus psychiques mobilisés dans un cadre thérapeutique et tout particulièrement sur ce que Winnicott appelle les phénomènes transitionnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiquesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207