Proximity Rules for Subsurface Transforming to Surface Flaws for Class 1 Ferritic Vessels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a rule in Acceptance Standards of Class 1 ferritic vessel in the ASME B&PV Code Section XI describing that allowable subsurface flaws near a component surface are transformed to allowable surface flaws. This is the proximity rule for the subsurface flaws. Allowable sizes of the subsurface flaws decrease with proximity to the component surface. Therefore, a subsurface flaw allowed in the component is not allowed if the same size subsurface flaw is slightly closer to the component surface. However, if the subsurface flaw with the same size is located closer to the component surface, the subsurface flaw not allowed close to the component surface is acceptable after transforming it to a surface flaw. This is a discontinuity of a subsurface flaw. This paper describes the discontinuity problems of the subsurface flaws transforming to surface flaws and proposes a new flaw-to-surface factor of proximity rule, minimizing the influence of the current allowable flaw sizes in the Acceptance Standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it