TRAJECTORY OF WATER JET EXPOSED TO LOW SUBSONIC CROSS-FLOW
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A water jet exposed to a low subsonic air cross-flow was studied experimentally to determine the jet/spray trajectory based on the jet's upper boundary. The nozzle diameter as well as the cross-flow and water jet speeds were varied to provide a wide range of experimental conditions. Although this study is not entirely novel, the results of previous research are extended to low subsonic cross-flows having a maximum axial velocity of about 70 m/s. The previous assertion that data from the supersonic range could be extrapolated straightforwardly to subsonic cases was shown to be largely true, even over a wider range of momentum flux ratios than those considered previously. In addition, an attempt was made to identify and discuss the possible reasons behind the lack of a universal jet/spray trajectory correlation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it