Antithetical Arts: On the Ancient Quarrel Between Literature and Music, by Peter Kivy.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analytic philosophers who write on music face a significant challenge: To write insightfully with precision and clarity, eschewing jargon and pretension, about the art which is perhaps most recalcitrant to verbal description. The audience may be philosophically very sophisticated (yet know little about music), or may be specialists in music (but little acquainted with philosophy). Trickiest of all, they may know a good deal about both. Peter Kivy has met these challenges handily in several books over the past thirty years or so and the current robust health of the philosophy of music is a testament to his good influence. Kivy’s latest book is a defense of ‘enhanced formalism’ — his name for the position he has developed and defended over the years. Essentially this is the view that absolute music is to be understood and appreciated as a structure of sound that may be expressive of ‘garden variety’ emotions. Although parts of the book have appeared separately it hangs together as a sustained argument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it