MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083310151 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.146

Measurements of Electrostatic Charging of Powder Mixtures in a Free-fall Test Device

2015· article· en· W2083310151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMaterials scienceTest (biology)Composite materialNuclear engineeringMechanicsForensic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrostatic charges generated during powder handling often adversely influence process performance. In cases where significant charges are present, accidental discharge of the accumulated charges may cause sparks, fires, even explosions, affecting process performance and causing significant safety concerns. Electrostatic charging is a complicated phenomenon, especially when handling powder mixtures of poly-disperse particles because of bi-polar charging, with small particles being charged opposite to their larger counterparts. Bipolar charging can lead to agglomeration, segregation and severe adhesion to walls or contact surfaces. Therefore, in order to characterize electrostatic properties of powders, it is desirable to measure not only the net charges on a powder, but also its polarity. In this work, a simple method is developed to investigate charge generation due to particle-particle collisions and particle-wall contact during powder handling. The experimental set-up consisted of two parallel copper plates connected to a high voltage power supply and a vibrating charging device with adjustable contacting surfaces. When subjected to a static electrical field, negatively charged particles moved to the positive side of the parallel plates, whereas positively charged particles migrated to the negative side. The separation of charged particles under investigation indicated bi-polar charging in a polydisperse powder system, with smaller particles carrying charges of polarity opposite to their larger counterparts. However, smaller particles were also found to carry two different charges from a set of fine particle-only experiments in binary powder mixtures. This was due to two different charging mechanisms: charge transfer and charge separation. In a further study with the addition of fine particles to mono-sized powders, the results indicated that the addition of fine particles helped reduce the net charges of the mixtures, with fine particles tending to carry positive charges after powder separation. When a typical antistatic agent (Larostat 519) was added to the mono-sized powders, the net charges of the mixtures decreased. Particle separation experiments revealed that this antistatic agent considerably altered the charging behavior of the host powders. This finding implies that the role of Larostat 519 in neutralizing charges differs from that of simple addition of other fine particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it