MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083330405 · doi:10.1017/s0067237811000877

Alexander Maxwell. Choosing Slovakia: Slavic Hungary, the Czechoslovak Language and Accidental Nationalism. International Library of Political Studies 37. London/New York: Tauris Academic Studies/I. B. Tauris Publishers, 2009. Pp. 262, illus., maps, charts.

2012· article· en· W2083330405 on OpenAlexaff
M. Mark Stolárik

Bibliographic record

VenueAustrian History Yearbook · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlavic languagesPoliticsNationalismAccidentalClassicsPolitical scienceMedia studiesHistorySociologyLawPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexander Maxwell. Choosing Slovakia: Slavic Hungary, the Czechoslovak Language and Accidental Nationalism. International Library of Political Studies 37. London/New York: Tauris Academic Studies/I. B. Tauris Publishers, 2009. Pp. 262, illus., maps, charts. - Volume 43

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustrian History YearbookSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207