MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083330586 · doi:10.1002/uog.1773

What does an increased atrial‐to‐ventricular length ratio mean in fetuses with atrioventricular septal defect?

2004· article· en· W2083330586 on OpenAlexaff
Shi‐Joon Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrioventricular valveAtrioventricular Septal DefectVentricleCardiologyInternal medicineTricuspid valveInteratrial septumPrimary interatrial foramenAtrioventricular blockAtrioventricular canalInterventricular septumAnatomyLeft atriumHeart diseaseForamen secundumPatent foramen ovale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) is named as such, the septal defect is in fact a variable component of this interesting congenital malformation. Depending on the relationship of the bridging atrioventricular valve leaflets to the defective atrial and ventricular septal edges, the shunt through the septal defect can be both interatrial and interventricular, exclusively interatrial (‘primum defect’), or, very rarely, exclusively interventricular1. When the atrioventricular valves are removed, however, those hearts categorized as having AVSDs look alike regardless of the subtype of defect1. The unifying features of various forms of AVSD are: 1) a deficiency of the atrioventricular septum between the left ventricle and the right atrium and adjacent atrial and ventricular septa showing a scooped-out configuration of the ventricular septal crest; 2) a common atrioventricular annulus with the aortic valve in an ‘unwedged’ position; 3) an abnormal ratio between the inlet and outlet dimensions of the left ventricle due to a short inlet and an elongated outlet (Figure 1). Diagrams illustrating unifying features of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). (a) Atrial and ventricular septum seen from the left ventricle after removal of the free wall of the left atrium and left ventricle and the mitral valve leaflets. (b) Atrioventricular junction seen from above after removal of the atria and great arterial trunks above the cardiac valves. In a normal heart, the tricuspid valve has a more apical attachment to the septum (solid line in (a), left) than does the mitral valve (interrupted line). The atrioventricular septum (AVS) is present between the right atrium and left ventricle because of this off-set attachment of the tricuspid and mitral valves to the septum. AVSD is characterized by a large defect involving the whole atrioventricular septum and adjacent ventricular and atrial septa, short inlet and elongated outlet with an inlet–outlet disproportion, and a common atrioventricular junction or annulus. The aortic valve (AV) is deeply wedged between the mitral (MV) and tricuspid (TV) valves in the normal heart. Hearts with an AVSD have a common atrioventricular valve annulus regardless of whether the atrioventricular valve orifice is partitioned. The common atrioventricular valve annulus does not allow the aortic valve to have a wedged position. Because of this unwedged position of the aortic valve, the left ventricular outflow tract is elongated. When a normal heart is scanned along a four-chamber plane perpendicular to the gray line in (a), the atrial length is approximately 50% of the ventricular length. When a heart with AVSD is scanned in a four-chamber view, the atrial length is only slightly shorter than the foreshortened ventricular length. The scooped-out ventricular septal crest with apically displaced bridging leaflets makes the ventricular inlet look even shorter in a regular four-chamber view. ABL, anterior bridging leaflet; Ao, aorta; MS, membranous septum; PBL, posterior bridging leaflet; PV, pulmonary valve. The diagnosis of AVSD can hardly be missed at echocardiography in children. Surprisingly, however, fetuses with this not uncommon malformation often escape detection2. In this issue, Machlitt, Heling and Chaoui introduced an increased atrial-to-ventricular length (AVL) ratio as a new fetal sonographic marker for AVSD3. In normal fetuses, the mean AVL was 0.47 with a 95% prediction interval of 0.35–0.63; in fetuses with AVSD, the mean AVL was 0.77 with a range of 0.59–0.99. This increased AVL in fetuses with AVSD is a numeric representation of an important common feature of the malformation: shortening of the inlet that results in inlet–outlet disproportion. Alternatively, the inlet–outlet disproportion could be calculated by measuring the inlet and outlet dimensions seen in the four-chamber and left ventricular outflow tract views, respectively. Shortening of the inlet in AVSD is due to the absence of the atrioventricular septum and adjacent ventricular septum. Shortening can be more obvious in a four-chamber echocardiogram as the defective ventricular septal crest characteristically shows a scooped-out appearance and the bridging leaflets of the atrioventricular valve are displaced towards the ventricles against the scooped-out ventricular septal crest, as Machlitt et al.3 explained in their Discussion (Figure 1, upper panel). The rare exceptions would be those AVSDs in which the bridging leaflets are attached to the atrial septal margin. Unfortunately, measurement of the atrial and ventricular lengths and calculation of the AVL may be cumbersome in daily screening fetal ultrasound, and few will be pleased to have one more parameter to remember. The authors' data, however, provide a firm statistical basis for a very simple message to those who are not fully familiar with AVSD: ‘atrioventricular septal defect should be suspected when the atrial length is more than 50% of the ventricular length in a four-chamber view’. If this simple but important sonographic feature were recognized at fetal screening, few cases with AVSD would escape detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207