MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inovación tecnológica y sistemas productivos locales

2006· article· es· W2083338581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomía UNAM · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFordismQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic systemContext (archaeology)Technological systemEconomic geographyFinancial crisisEconomyPolitical scienceBusinessEconomicsGeographyEngineeringKeynesian economicsIndustrial engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THIS ARTICLE UNDERLINES THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RENOVATION OF SO-CALLED LOCAL PRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS, PARTICULARLY IN EUROPE, AND THE ROLE THEY HAVE PLAYED IN THE LAST QUARTER OF A CENTURY IN A CONTEXT OF PROFOUND PRODUCTIVE, TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL CHANGES. AFTER SKETCHING THE CONCEPT OF LOCAL PRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS USED IN THE ARTICLE, THE FIRST PART OUTLINES THE MAIN TRANSFORMATIONS DERIVED FROM THE CRISIS OF THE FORDIST SYSTEM AND ANALYZES THE EVOLUTION OF LOCAL PRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS AFTER THE CRISIS OF TRADITIONAL REGIONS. THEN, THE AUTHOR COMMENTS ON SOME OF ITS MORE REPRESENTATIVE FORMS, PARTICULARLY UNDERLINING THE TECHNOLOGICAL FACTOR, SINCE IT IS OF INTEREST TO HIGHLIGHT THE ROLE KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION HAVE PLAYED IN THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL DYNAMIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it